| Starship Corporation http://www.starshipcorporation.com/forum/ |
|
| Compressed storage should have a downside http://www.starshipcorporation.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=4376 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | AartBluestoke [ Sat 31. Dec 2016, 06:44 ] |
| Post subject: | Compressed storage should have a downside |
Hi, I've been playing a while and now have most techs. With engines there is a tradeoff which means that you don't just automatically put a transgalactic in every shuttle, or even a fission forward. This tradeoff is both space, and fuel usage (supplying the extra fuel for fission forward is hard). There is also cost; the interstellar, and intergalactic cost more. When it comes to storage, compressed storage comes with no downsides; it's smaller, cheaper, and more storage than everything else (except perhaps a small for water, if you want to save 1 width and store much less). I propose that compressed water take more energy supply, compressed air take coolant, and all compressed storage cost more. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|